15-07-2009, 05:31 PM
Sad movies are annoying and retarded. Sadness is a very easy emotion to induce, and most idiots confuse "profuse amounts of any emotion" with terms like "moving", "deep", "profound" and other such words.
The essence of my message today is as follows:
"If a writer is unable to make a story that is good, it is easy to throw in sad bits that the general population will retardulate into "good story". Unfortunately for them, I am not fooled.
A long while ago a friend of mine (a woman) told me that "Grave of the Fireflies" was a great anime movie. Intrigued by the vague title and good review I was tricked into watching the movie.
It takes place in Japan during the bombings of the second world war. Just so everyone knows, Japan got bombed a lot. Anyway, the story follows a young boy and his family after a bombing that decimated his town. Except that instead of his family, it's just his little sister because his family is all dead. Basically he wanders around trying to survive with her, and his extended family doesn't like him because that's just the kind of movie it is. So then his sister dies, and he wanders around some more, and he dies too. Woo, great movie. Except, not great movie. It sucked.
Off the top of my head I'm going to say that it won every award ever. Was it enjoyable to watch? Hell no. Good plot? No plot. Good anything? No, no good anything, just death and sadness.
I've got a great idea, why don't they make some movie about a girl who's dying of leukemia, but also trying to live life to the fullest with her family. That'd be an awesome movie! Oh wait, that'd be terrible, who would ever want to watch that? Oh wait... it's already being made, I saw the previews yesterday, it's called: "My Sisters Keeper" and it looks to be a massively sappy story of someone who eventually dies.
Lucky we don't live in Korea. Korea happens to be the global capital of retarded sad stories that morons LOOOOOOOVE. Korea is famous for it's TV Dramas. Basically they put out a massive number of dramas every year and all of them are Romeo and Juliet all over again, except that it's normally death by disease.
Just browse 10 random K-Dramas and the plots will basically read someting like:
- Siblings Jun and Eri become lovers when they discovered that Eri was accidentally switched at birth. Soon after she discovers she has the same terminal illness as her birth-mother and dies a month later. Jun drowns himself due to sorrow.
- Young orphan Eri has finally struggled through poverty to obtain her dream job as a horse trainer. She begins an affair with a stable hand who she later learns has a blood disease. He dies and she gets killed by a horse somehow.
If it weren't for my incredible disdain for cheap emotional points I'd make a sad movie too. It'd be easy and I wouldn't have to spend a cent on special effects. It'd be called "The Heroic Baby Who Died Alone".
It'd basically be about some baby who tries to save some kittens from a bear. But fails, and gets mauled by the bear, then the bear will somehow realize that it is in fact the baby's mom, somehow, and will jump off a cliff in remorse. It'll land on and mash a second baby who just overcame brain cancer. Women all over the world will love it.
I think the whole reason sad movies even get away with this BS is that people are too afraid to criticize something sad.
"OMFG!!! YOU HATED GRAVE OF THE FIREFLIES!!! BUT JAPAN WAS REALLY BOMBED LIKE THAT!! HOW CAN YOU NOT CARE!!!?"
- I do care, I just though the MOVIE was retarded.
"OMGAFLAK!!! YOU ARE MAKING FUN OF "MY SISTER'S" KEEPER!!? YOU'RE AN ASS! LEUKEMIA IS SERIOUS! SHE DIES!!!"
- Leukemia IS serious, death IS serious, but movies that cheaply reference them don't instantly win the contest... you retarded freak.
Take the movie "The Ringer" for example, most of it was decent, but all the scenes involving the "love story" were incredibly crappy. Horribly acted, cheesy and retarded. Everyone can agree that movie was ruined by a pathetic attempt at a love story. BUT what if one of the special-athletes were to die during competition!!? I'm suuuuuure people would have thought that was pure gold.
I summary, if you can't make a good movie, don't make one at all. It's better than cheaping out with some pathetic sad story line that's completely crap that people are too "sensitive" to criticize.
I hope "My Sister's Keeper" tanks miserably, but I know there will be an entire fleet of women who love it for the simple reason that their brains can't distinguish between "good" and "pretend it's good so I don't offend anyone".
The essence of my message today is as follows:
"If a writer is unable to make a story that is good, it is easy to throw in sad bits that the general population will retardulate into "good story". Unfortunately for them, I am not fooled.
A long while ago a friend of mine (a woman) told me that "Grave of the Fireflies" was a great anime movie. Intrigued by the vague title and good review I was tricked into watching the movie.
It takes place in Japan during the bombings of the second world war. Just so everyone knows, Japan got bombed a lot. Anyway, the story follows a young boy and his family after a bombing that decimated his town. Except that instead of his family, it's just his little sister because his family is all dead. Basically he wanders around trying to survive with her, and his extended family doesn't like him because that's just the kind of movie it is. So then his sister dies, and he wanders around some more, and he dies too. Woo, great movie. Except, not great movie. It sucked.
Off the top of my head I'm going to say that it won every award ever. Was it enjoyable to watch? Hell no. Good plot? No plot. Good anything? No, no good anything, just death and sadness.
I've got a great idea, why don't they make some movie about a girl who's dying of leukemia, but also trying to live life to the fullest with her family. That'd be an awesome movie! Oh wait, that'd be terrible, who would ever want to watch that? Oh wait... it's already being made, I saw the previews yesterday, it's called: "My Sisters Keeper" and it looks to be a massively sappy story of someone who eventually dies.
Lucky we don't live in Korea. Korea happens to be the global capital of retarded sad stories that morons LOOOOOOOVE. Korea is famous for it's TV Dramas. Basically they put out a massive number of dramas every year and all of them are Romeo and Juliet all over again, except that it's normally death by disease.
Just browse 10 random K-Dramas and the plots will basically read someting like:
- Siblings Jun and Eri become lovers when they discovered that Eri was accidentally switched at birth. Soon after she discovers she has the same terminal illness as her birth-mother and dies a month later. Jun drowns himself due to sorrow.
- Young orphan Eri has finally struggled through poverty to obtain her dream job as a horse trainer. She begins an affair with a stable hand who she later learns has a blood disease. He dies and she gets killed by a horse somehow.
If it weren't for my incredible disdain for cheap emotional points I'd make a sad movie too. It'd be easy and I wouldn't have to spend a cent on special effects. It'd be called "The Heroic Baby Who Died Alone".
It'd basically be about some baby who tries to save some kittens from a bear. But fails, and gets mauled by the bear, then the bear will somehow realize that it is in fact the baby's mom, somehow, and will jump off a cliff in remorse. It'll land on and mash a second baby who just overcame brain cancer. Women all over the world will love it.
I think the whole reason sad movies even get away with this BS is that people are too afraid to criticize something sad.
"OMFG!!! YOU HATED GRAVE OF THE FIREFLIES!!! BUT JAPAN WAS REALLY BOMBED LIKE THAT!! HOW CAN YOU NOT CARE!!!?"
- I do care, I just though the MOVIE was retarded.
"OMGAFLAK!!! YOU ARE MAKING FUN OF "MY SISTER'S" KEEPER!!? YOU'RE AN ASS! LEUKEMIA IS SERIOUS! SHE DIES!!!"
- Leukemia IS serious, death IS serious, but movies that cheaply reference them don't instantly win the contest... you retarded freak.
Take the movie "The Ringer" for example, most of it was decent, but all the scenes involving the "love story" were incredibly crappy. Horribly acted, cheesy and retarded. Everyone can agree that movie was ruined by a pathetic attempt at a love story. BUT what if one of the special-athletes were to die during competition!!? I'm suuuuuure people would have thought that was pure gold.
I summary, if you can't make a good movie, don't make one at all. It's better than cheaping out with some pathetic sad story line that's completely crap that people are too "sensitive" to criticize.
I hope "My Sister's Keeper" tanks miserably, but I know there will be an entire fleet of women who love it for the simple reason that their brains can't distinguish between "good" and "pretend it's good so I don't offend anyone".